The World Until
Yesterday
Jared Diamond
Read it in Hardback
at 512 pages.
Jared Diamond, you
are a man of many talents and educational degrees who has traveled the world
for a variety of reasons and are able to take many interesting conjectures from
so many different points and spin them into a comprehensive and unique vantage
point that dissect human history and aim to improve the human experience. This is why I read your books, despite the
handy-cap of an unequal margin of intelligence.
Last year I read Mr. Diamonds book titled Collapse and was intrigued and
educated throughout its pages. This year
as I was stumbling through Costco I decided to rummage past the book and media
isle, something I usually try to actively not do, and saw this. Into the over-sized cart it went.
The World Until
Yesterday takes a magnifying glass to what Diamond labels as Traditional
societies compared to its modern counterparts and what we can learn from our
roots.
The broad parent
topics include:
1: Setting the Stage
by Dividing Space - This section details out how modern and traditional
societies handle their citizens, the threat of transients and unknowns, and
also how we both decipher their intentions and deal with subsequent enemy
menace.
2: Peace and War -
The states of any society and how they handle these unsure topics. How societies treat their neighbors and how
they war with their enemies. Both
Traditional and Modern societies handle this interestingly and have different fallout because of it.
3: Young and Old - A
common problem no matter what society you are part of is the fact that everyone
gets old, but how does everyone deal with their elderly?
4: Danger and
Response - You think you may know what kind of dangers befall a traditional
society but there is some really eye opening things in this heading about our
westernized society.
5: Region, Language,
and Health: The bits about Health are scary, really scary, at least the
implications of modernizing the world.
The overall
criticism of Diamonds writing is that it is too opinionated or that he pushes a
conclusion and that his opinion is the only available logical conjunction. As each of his books come out I see less and
less of this in his writing, except on the topics that are no-brainers, and I
don't know if that's in response to these criticisms or if the subject matter
provides less opportunities to readily say which is the right way. Throughout reading The World Until Yesterday
I was waiting for Mr. Diamond to tell me which was the right way but he rarely
takes sides, except on the easily apparent, which I appreciated.
