A place for me to share the books I read and whatever else is floating about in my head.

My goal is 40 books this year, wish me luck.

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

What I Am Reading - With Wings Like Eagles


With Wings Like Eagles - A History of the Battle of Britain
Michael Korda
Read it in paperback, a short read at 352 pages.

I really enjoy reading about the golden age of aerial combat, more specifically what is known as the Dog Fight.  As someone who owns a dog that likes to fight, this is the perfect terminology.  The fundamentals are simple, the biggest-baddest dog in the pack picks a target and then it becomes a swirling aerial melee of carnage as each dog attempts to use speed, altitude, and positioning to rend an opponent from the sky.  The limitations of aerial technology in the 1930's pushed the envelope in a realm that was still being hastily flushed out, especially aerial combat, in war time conditions.  It's interesting to read because flying these things took courage, real courage and nerves of steel.  When your own aircraft could simply stop working (engine malfunction, gun jam, landing gear failure, etc.) when you needed it the most or be turned into a molten ball of burning wreckage, streaking down from the heavens in an instant, all because you didn't see the enemy racing in above you using the sun as cover at 648 km/h, and all he had to do was flip the trigger for two seconds.

But where to begin?  WW2 was frantic with aerial combat.  Personally the European Theater is the most interesting to me.  At the time in which The Battle of Britain would commence, Germany had swept west with such efficiency and speed that they controlled most of the European continent with little loss, effectively rendering the general populace to their control while beginning to fortify their positions.   The only point of opposition still standing being the British.  Hitler, who was holding out for what he believed was imminent surrender from the British was apprehensive about committing to a land invasion over the channel and left it to his air force to pummel the British into this surrender.  As the months from the disaster at Dunkirk ticked on, one man, was tasked with formulating the defense of Britain.  This man's name was Hugh Dowding and this is widely the story of his efforts leading up to and during the Battle of Britain from a technical perspective. 

The book itself covers, generically, the efforts of Dowding to formulate an ingenious plan for defense of Britain in the face of opposition within his country and from the obvious impending external monster camped on the beaches of France and Norway followed by the execution of that defense during the highest frenzy of aerial combat.  It details out the plan, the execution, the players (both politically and militarily during the time), as well as the aircraft and pilots that would take part.

I thoroughly enjoyed it despite Mr. Kurdas' use of fact repetition, often covering content he had just captured in the chapter before.  It happens with some frequency but really isn't that much of a big deal.  Full of references and some pretty pictures this is a good read if you want some more detailed information about the Battle of Britain.  It most certainly not an account from the pilots point of view however.


Tuesday, April 16, 2013

What I Am Reading - Never Let Me Go


Never Let Me Go
Kazuo Ishiguro
Read it in paper back at 304 pages.

March's OLT book club pick, the third for the year, selected by none other than the most avid reader in our little collective, Kazuo Ishiguro's Never Let Me Go.  Never Let Me Go at the time it was published was widely received as a success being named by TIME as the best book of the year as well as one of the best English novels from 1923 to 2005, among other awards and eventually becoming a major motion picture.  Ishiguro himself, is probably best known for his work Remains of the Day. 

High expectations.

Kathy goes to a boarding school called Hailsham.  Her days are filled with lessons, artwork, a high emphasis on fitness, and of course her fellow class-mates.  Kathy's friend Ruth is the bell of the ball at Hailsham and as for as long as Kathy can remember, the social nucleus for all of the girls in Kathy's grade.  Kathy's other friend is Tommy, a youth who is prone to bouts of anger and a terrible artist to boot.  This is their story, primarily comprised of the interactions that peppered their youth, how they mitigate and grow together, and of course about the impending donations.  They all know what's expected of them and that their time will come, but someday they must also leave Hailsham and what's not directly in front of you is always far ahead or behind you.

The book is structured into three lumps, Childhood, Adult, and Donor.  Childhood is exactly as I described above and primarily focuses on the three's interaction within the structured lifestyle of Hailsham.  Adult elevates their age, enhanced interactions, and covers that awkward time when people are discovering themselves and what it means to be an adult in the world.  The third comprises something else altogether and I won't elaborate much further as most of the turns for the book come in this section.

The book itself captures social interaction in an honest and righteous way, while managing to convince me as a reader, of the unpredictability of the human character in social spaces.  We are after all flawed beings with deep social necessities.  Most of the book is about the characters interactions and is less about action scenes or large reveals.  It's a sensitive thing capturing human emotion and communication habits.

So how did OLT receive it since the majority of us gravitate towards action and I would be honest enough to state that human interaction isn't exactly a focus area for any of us.  On a ten point scale with 1 being the worst thing ever and 10 being a must read, we faired pretty well.

Th3ee: 7
Dust: 5
Jhylen: 6
SS: 6
AndyCoug: 7
RaveDave: 6
TechnicalTom: 3
Eleach: 9
Shel: 5

With only nine completing of the ten I think we did work and this got a higher average, 6, than I was expecting.  Go us or what not.

Without a doubt Tommy was the favorite character with only two 'shout-outs' to the main character of the entire story, Kathy.  Most everyones favorite moments were consolidated to section three so I will keep this just as aloof as I did above.

Give it a whirl, you might be surprised.

What I Am Reading - Everything is Illuminated



Everything is Illuminated
Jonathan Safran Foer
276 pages, read in paperback with it's neat cover design.

Books as gifts are amazing, send them over any time.  This was a gift from a good friend who also shares an affinity for reading, albeit usually different genres completely.  None the less, a book given is a book consumed, even if it took me a few more months to get to than I was expecting.

The gifted book of course being Jonathan Safran Foer's Everything is Illuminated.

Jonathan (same name as the author) is on a trip, but he is not visiting Ukraine to view the sites, experience the culture, or eat new things.  He has come on a mission to find what remains of his family, post holocaust, and his only clue is an old picture.  He's hired what he believes to be a thorough tour guide but it is revealed to be our supporting cast of characters.  His translator is a Ukrainian native and youth named Alex Perchov, his grandfather as their driver, and an eccentric dog named Sammy Davis Jr. Jr. for comedic relief.  All three of them are unqualified as tour guides.  Throughout their quest we are given a glimpse of Ukraine as Jonathan sees it currently, as it was in the past, and of course there is the illumination.

The story is actually written in three different styles with two, arguably separate, plot arcs.  The first is written from the perspective of the Shtetl as its growing, which follows Jonathan's distant relatives and the town that their interactions create.  It's a whimsical place rich with magic realism and a hint of Jewish mysticism.  The second is Alex's story documenting the trip with Jonathan and provides the modern part of the story.  The third bit is simply a one sided correspondence between Jonathan and Alex in which Jonathan is giving Alex feedback on the modern parts of the story as they are written, but we are only shown Alex's letters.  All three are rewarding, but I think my favorite was the modern portions written from the perspective of Alex.  They were humorous and sat with me in a much deeper fashion then the chronological development of the Shtetl. 

Overall a very rewarding read but the reveal came too early for me and I felt that we were spiraling until the end when it closes sadly.  I would have preferred that Mr. Safran Foer had embellished the correspondence and included both sides, this would have done a lot to the narrative of the story.


Monday, April 8, 2013

How Life Come Today - Luck Rules Everything Around Me



How Life Comes Today – A series of some of my more obsessive traits and observations.

Luck Rules Everything Around Me -

I hate when I let hope creep up and take over me, I simply have to stop doing this.  You would think that genuine and well intentioned hope was something to foster, to want to be in effect and encouraged, but for me it’s not like that and it seems the things I hope most for never transpire.  I simply hope too much.

Maybe I hope for the wrong things.  Instead of hoping that I get a raise that I have been working for, or that a beautiful lady might be interested in me, or maybe that everything wrong will be okay for a loved one. I should instead hope for more realistic things.  Start low, keep it simple, and not hope for anything too grand.  I could start by hoping in things I know to have a relative high success chance.  A developing strategy for hedging hope.  Therefor I will now hope that my dog will be in the yard each day, that I don’t run out of toothpaste in the morning, and that my car will start each morning that I turn the key.  Maybe once I have some reserved success in hope that I can then hope for bigger and better things.  From there I can hope that there is beer in the fridge or that a roommate did their chores without anyone asking; you know, start hoping for things that are dependent on another, slowly.  In this way I will simply investing in things I know with relative ease, the predictable, and slowly transfer to the more difficult.  Careful to hope if the complexity is too large and to be reasonable with hoping when it’s with another and to most certainly not to remain so invested with my hope.

Hope is like currency right?  To be collected and spent carefully for when you really need it?  No wonder Hopes twin brother is Luck.  They look exactly the same to this poor hopeless beggar and doomed romantic.  You really can’t have hope without luck, in fact I think when one hopes it’s just an incantation that invites luck.  Usually the things that I hope for require a lot of luck, apparently, and I spent all my luck on something long ago.  I never thought I asked for anything so grand or un-achievable.  

Alas, not today, and probably not tomorrow.

But just maybe Le Bon Temps Viendra.

Some people though, they are just chalk full of hope and luck.  They spend it without even knowing they have got it and that they seem to have inexhaustible lumps of it.  They take it for granted like all people with wealth that didn’t have to earn it.  A black card with no limit, and although the interest is high, they never have a problem paying it off.  Everything seems to works in their favor, especially the things that shouldn't.  They have no reason for hope because luck is already there, they already have what they need.